In theory, the search for differing points of view and historical accuracy (e.g. truth about slavery and sexism) is certainly laudable and necessary. Education should foster in all students an appreciation for other opinions and a desire to know, even when uncomfortable and embarrassing, the truth. But how should the drive to reach this goal be directed?
Diversity of view and historical accuracy should be prized as qualities of content, but they are qualities that are demonstrable and easily verified. But when judging the multiculturalism of a curriculum, we often hear about how many books assigned were written by women or written by authors of other races. This is dangerous and I think needs to stop. Yes, the search for different points of view will often lead to authors of different races and backgrounds, but to discriminate classroom content based solely upon that is dangerously close to perpetuating very false distinctions between races.
Question: Is there a danger is seeking authors of different races rather than the merit of their work?
I responded to your post.
ReplyDeleteI was going to respond to this post (and I still may), but Emily's response captures much of the critique I was about to offer. I agree that the question seems to offer up a false dilemma, in that it is certainly more than possible to select quality works by authors of different races to use as educational materials.
ReplyDeleteJake, my mistake. I responded to your question regarding this topic on Superbowl Sunday, and I forgot to tell you through a comment on here.
ReplyDelete